top of page

March Madness Tested

Here's how the GTD method performed in past March Madness tournaments relative to other professional ranking systems. All numbers shown to the right of Season and Tournament Round are the percentage of tournament games correct.

Working backwards, the NEFF is the net efficiency. It's a ranking system based solely on this stat. Whichever team has the larger net efficiency is the higher ranked team. This is included as a benchmark model, since net efficiency is widely accepted as a statistic that represents a team's ability. As you'll see below, net efficiency is a decent round 1 system, but fails to distinguish well in subsequent rounds.

AP is Associated Press and USA is USA Today.

POM, MAS, and SAG are for Ken Pomeroy, Ken Massey, and Jeff Sagarin, respectively - all legends in the basketball ratings world.

Filter by season: 

2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
All
Season
Tournament Round
GTD
POM
MAS
SAG
AP
USA
NEFF
2018
1
0.8125
0.75
0.78125
0.71875
0.625
0.65625
0.65625
2018
2
0.5625
0.625
0.6875
0.6875
0.5625
0.625
0.5625
2018
3
0.5
0.5
0.625
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.625
2018
4
0.75
0.75
1
0.5
0.75
0.75
0.75
2018
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2018
6
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2017
1
0.84375
0.8125
0.8125
0.84375
0.75
0.75
0.78125
2017
2
0.6875
0.625
0.6875
0.6875
0.75
0.75
0.4375
2017
3
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.5
2017
4
0.25
0.5
0.25
0.5
0.25
0.25
0.75
2017
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2017
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2016
1
0.75
0.75
0.6875
0.6875
0.5
0.53125
0.78125
2016
2
0.875
0.75
0.8125
0.875
0.6875
0.75
0.625
2016
3
0.875
0.75
0.875
0.875
0.75
0.75
0.625
2016
4
0.5
0.5
0.25
0.5
0.25
0.25
0.5
2016
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2016
6
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
2015
1
0.8125
0.8125
0.78125
0.8125
0.65625
0.6875
0.75
2015
2
0.75
0.75
0.6875
0.8125
0.5625
0.5625
0.6875
2015
3
0.75
0.875
0.875
0.875
0.875
0.875
0.875
2015
4
0.75
0.5
0.5
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.25
2015
5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
2015
6
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
2014
1
0.84375
0.8125
0.71875
0.75
0.59375
0.59375
0.8125
2014
2
0.6875
0.6875
0.6875
0.6875
0.625
0.625
0.5
2014
3
0.5
0.375
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.625
2014
4
0.5
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
2014
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2014
6
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
bottom of page